Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Conclusion

For this test, we collected both a water sample and a smear sample from four different water collectors. Two of the water collectors were plastic and two were concrete; each of the four collectors was from a different downspout on one side of a building.
In the water sample from the first plastic water collector (#1), there were several rotifers and many ciliates. In the water sample from the first cement water collector (#2), there were some cyanobacteria. In the water sample from the second plastic water collector (#3), there were a few rotifers. And in the water sample from the second cement water collector (#4), there was a rotifer, a nematode, a few ciliates, and some algae.
In the smear sample for #1, we found one worm and one amoeba. In the smear sample for #2, there were five unknown organisms. In the sample for #3, there was some algae. And in sample #4, there was one unidentified bug.
In conclusion, it appeared that the plastic water collectors were more conducive to microlife because the majority of ciliates and rotifers were found there.

No comments:

Post a Comment